Redefine Christianity
Conveying Jesus to a skeptical world
by Zach Smith
Back in August 2008, I was anxious to see the volume of people coming into Denver for the Democratic National Convention. But nothing could have prepared me for what I saw as we walked the downtown streets.
“Ask me why YOU deserve HELL !” My heart dropped as I approached the banner waving these poisonous words. Riot police surrounded the group of christians (emphasis on the little “c”), protecting them from the ever-growing crowd of enraged pedestrians. Other signs littered the street corner and held up traffic for blocks:
“Homo sex is a threat to national security,” “Looking for change? Then do what Christ said and repent,” “WARNING : Baby Killing Women, Party Animals, Rebellious Women, So Called Christians, Liberals, Jesus Mockers, Porno Freaks, Muslims, Drunks, Homosexuals, Sex Addicts, Mormons . . . GOD WILL JUDGE YOU !”
We watched in disbelief as insults were hurled into the crowd from the christians, with unbridled anger and self-righteousness. I was sick to my stomach. I looked helplessly at the throngs of people passing by and felt a heavy sadness: Jesus, for many of these people, was now associated with threatening language and hatred. I felt anger and even shame because, as a Christian myself, I was involuntarily associated with this hate rally.
Above all the emotions, however, I was more than ever convinced of my job, and your job: to love.
Thousands of people, after that week in Denver, see Christians as people who hate. We must re-define Christianity to a watching world.
What if we became known, instead, for the way we love homosexuals and come alongside those struggling with addictions? What if we became known for the way we embrace people of other religions and backgrounds, as well as the way we love women who have had, or are thinking about having, abortions?
We passed other protests and continued walking toward Civic Center Park. Anti-war booths and anarchist gatherings dotted the lawn. Tattooed, dread-locked hippies relaxed in the sunshine. Droves of police, outfitted in full riot gear, stood nearby.
We walked up to the eclectic gathering and saw a sign that read, “Doc’s Place,” which was a volunteer-run, free medical clinic. Under another sign, “Food not Bombs,” people were preparing food for anyone who was hungry.
Being hungry ourselves, we hopped in line. I was served by a girl who had obviously not showered in several days and was adorned with a variety of tattoos and piercings. She smiled and asked how I was doing. I said I was doing great and thanked her for the food. In the “kitchen” was a collection of mostly young adults who seemed to draw energy from each other and the people they were serving. Everyone was accepted. It was one of the best meals I have ever shared with anyone.
Friends, I witnessed two very different groups of people that week. One group was insulting, abrasive and judgmental. The other simply wanted to serve. The way I see it, only one group acted like Jesus. I challenge you and myself to take back Jesus’ name and represent Him accurately—with love and compassion. Change will not happen overnight. But I am convinced that when we love like Jesus, we are slowly but surely helping to prepare someone’s heart for God to do His work. Love well, brothers and sisters. Re-define Christ for the people in your lives and see what happens.
Zach Smith works with Dry Bones, an inner-city ministry in Denver, and is a member of Bethany EFC in Littleton, Colo. Visit the Web to read the full-length version of this and other “stories from the streets” (drybonesdenver.org, under the “stories” tab).


Visitor
Tue, 07/07/2009 - 00:02
It’s not a matter of redefining Christianity but transforming the world’s view on what it means to be a Christian. It is our job to transform, not to redefine.
Visitor
Mon, 07/27/2009 - 21:19
did anyone in the “loving” group tell you that if you reject Christ that you will suffer in hell for eternity? just how loving is it to feed a stranger’s belly, and then not take the next step of feeding their soul? that doesn’t excuse the attitudes you express of the first group; sounded like they had a right message with a wrong attitude. the “loving” failed to speak the truth; the first group failed to speak it in love. your article failed to discern this. i’ve been a member of efree for a long time, and am disappointed with the pro-emergent shift that is happening. please take another look at your assessment of both groups - then tell me how efree can better present Jesus to a lost and dying world.
Visitor
Mon, 07/27/2009 - 21:29
The article has a definite point of view - I’m reading your words and seeing your sympathy for the social justice movement. I also went to your church web site to see what resources are recommended. I found an interesting mix, but as expected found the Richard Foster/Dallas Willard/Leonard Sweet books that promote new age mysticism in the name of contemplative prayer, Tony Campolo that promotes another Jesus, and Rick Warren who promotes…Rick Warren.
It saddens me that preaching Christ crucified, in season and out of season, is being replaced with so many versions of mankinds religion.
Visitor
Fri, 06/04/2010 - 01:10
AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!
Visitor
Fri, 06/04/2010 - 02:53
How refreshing to hear the discernment of the visitors of this site. It’s painfully obvious that the author’s article portayed two extremes with an obvious agenda. It’s the ol’ either/or choice. Then we are called to “redefine” all of Christianity because one group of people the author witnessed picketing were out of line. Subjective experience calls for the “redefinement” of Christianity? Scary criteria. True Christianity is defined by God through His Word and is not up for an opinion poll. It is heartbreaking to see the forsaking of the truth of the Word of God for man centered theology and traditions. I am also refering to the EFCA courting the emerging church. YES, feed the poor, take care of the needy but these DO NOT replace the proclamation of the true Gospel message, Jesus Christ and Him crucified for our sins. The absolute necessity of the repentance of sin and believing on the Lord Jesus Christ alone for salvation knows no social or cultural boundries. This truth needs to be faithfully preached in love WITHOUT SHAME to humankind of every station in life, rich and poor alike. “Oh, but we would NEVER forsake the true gospel!” The slippery decent is in motion. You will be hard pressed to find any remnant of the true Gospel message within the emerging church. The distortion is insidious and deceptive…”Jesus’ mission was to make the world a better place and as his followers we are called to do the same.” Wow! Just enough of a twist to result in a Christless eternity! God does not need man to “redefine” Christianity. We need to be faithful to and obey what God has already clearly established in His Word and His definition of what it means to be a disciple of Jesus Christ, Matthew 10, Luke 14. God does not need man to “trouble shoot” postmodernism. Cultures change at practically every county line. Could our societies possibly be showing symptoms of a compromising church that flirts with the world? How adultrous are we? The salt is rapidly losing its flavor. How much time is spent on our faces, broken before a Holy God for those lost and dying in their sin? How devastating to know the EFCA is compromising and allowing the influence of the emerging church (new age repackaged for evangelical consumption) to infiltrate into the church deceiving people with a different gospel. The accountability is unfathomable!
Post new comment